Below is a categorized list of important formulas used in neutrino theory, oscillations, interactions, astrophysics, cosmology, and detector physics. Natural units, (\hbar=c=1), are often used.
[E_\nu^2=p_\nu^2c^2+m_\nu^2c^4]
For an ultrarelativistic neutrino, (p_\nu c\gg m_\nu c^2):
[E_\nu \simeq p_\nu c+\frac{m_\nu^2c^3}{2p_\nu}]
In natural units:
[E_\nu \simeq p_\nu+\frac{m_\nu^2}{2E_\nu}]
[v_\nu=\frac{p_\nu c^2}{E_\nu}]
For (m_\nu\ll E_\nu):
[v_\nu \simeq c\left(1-\frac{m_\nu^2c^4}{2E_\nu^2}\right)]
\sum_{i=1}^{3}U_{\alpha i}^{*}|\nu_i\rangle
]
where
[
\alpha=e,\mu,\tau,
\qquad
i=1,2,3.
]
\sum_{\alpha=e,\mu,\tau}U_{\alpha i}|\nu_\alpha\rangle
]
\sum_i U_{\alpha i}|\bar{\nu}_i\rangle
]
[
U^\dagger U=UU^\dagger=I
]
or
\delta_{\alpha\beta}.
]
The three-flavor Pontecorvo–Maki–Nakagawa–Sakata matrix is
R_{23}R_{13}R_{12}.
]
A common parameterization is
[
U=
\begin{pmatrix}
c_{12}c_{13}
&
s_{12}c_{13}
&
s_{13}e^{-i\delta_{\rm CP}}
\
-s_{12}c_{23}-c_{12}s_{23}s_{13}e^{i\delta_{\rm CP}}
&
c_{12}c_{23}-s_{12}s_{23}s_{13}e^{i\delta_{\rm CP}}
&
s_{23}c_{13}
\
s_{12}s_{23}-c_{12}c_{23}s_{13}e^{i\delta_{\rm CP}}
&
-c_{12}s_{23}-s_{12}c_{23}s_{13}e^{i\delta_{\rm CP}}
&
c_{23}c_{13}
\end{pmatrix},
]
where
[
s_{ij}=\sin\theta_{ij},
\qquad
c_{ij}=\cos\theta_{ij}.
]
For Majorana neutrinos:
U_{\rm PMNS}
\begin{pmatrix}
1&0&0\
0&e^{i\alpha_{21}/2}&0\
0&0&e^{i\alpha_{31}/2}
\end{pmatrix}.
]
[
\Delta m_{ij}^{2}=m_i^2-m_j^2
]
Important differences include
[
\Delta m_{21}^{2}=m_2^2-m_1^2
]
and
[
\Delta m_{31}^{2}=m_3^2-m_1^2.
]
[
m_1<m_2<m_3
]
[
m_3<m_1<m_2
]
[
\Sigma m_\nu=m_1+m_2+m_3
]
For mass eigenstate (\nu_i):
e^{-iE_it}|\nu_i(0)\rangle
]
For relativistic neutrinos:
[
E_i\simeq E+\frac{m_i^2}{2E}.
]
The phase difference is
\frac{\Delta m_{ij}^{2}L}{2E}.
]
The oscillatory term is commonly written as
[
\sin^2\left(\frac{\Delta m_{ij}^{2}L}{4E}\right).
]
In practical units:
[
\sin^2\left(
1.267,
\frac{\Delta m_{ij}^{2}(\mathrm{eV}^2)L(\mathrm{km})}
{E(\mathrm{GeV})}
\right).
]
\cos\theta,|\nu_1\rangle
+
\sin\theta,|\nu_2\rangle
]
-\sin\theta,|\nu_1\rangle
+
\cos\theta,|\nu_2\rangle.
]
\sin^2(2\theta)
\sin^2\left(
\frac{\Delta m^2L}{4E}
\right)
]
or, in practical units,
\sin^2(2\theta)
\sin^2\left[
1.267,
\frac{\Delta m^2(\mathrm{eV}^2)L(\mathrm{km})}
{E(\mathrm{GeV})}
\right].
]
1-
\sin^2(2\theta)
\sin^2\left(
\frac{\Delta m^2L}{4E}
\right).
]
[
P_{\alpha\alpha}+P_{\alpha\beta}=1.
]
\frac{4\pi E}{|\Delta m^2|}
]
In practical units:
[
L_{\rm osc}(\mathrm{km})
\simeq
2.48,
\frac{E(\mathrm{GeV})}
{|\Delta m^2|(\mathrm{eV}^2)}.
]
\frac{\pi}{2}.
]
Therefore,
\frac{2\pi}{|\Delta m^2|}.
]
In practical units:
\frac{\pi}{2}.
]
The vacuum transition probability is
4\sum_{i>j}
\operatorname{Re}
\left(
U_{\alpha i}^{}U_{\beta i}
U_{\alpha j}U_{\beta j}^{}
\right)
\sin^2\Delta_{ij}
]
[
\quad
+
2\sum_{i>j}
\operatorname{Im}
\left(
U_{\alpha i}^{}U_{\beta i}
U_{\alpha j}U_{\beta j}^{}
\right)
\sin(2\Delta_{ij}),
]
where
\frac{\Delta m_{ij}^{2}L}{4E}.
]
For antineutrinos:
[
U\rightarrow U^{*},
]
so the sign of the CP-odd term changes.
P(\bar{\nu}\alpha\rightarrow\bar{\nu}\beta)
}{
P(\nu_\alpha\rightarrow\nu_\beta)
+
P(\bar{\nu}\alpha\rightarrow\bar{\nu}\beta)
}.
]
c_{12}s_{12}
c_{23}s_{23}
c_{13}^{2}s_{13}
\sin\delta_{\rm CP}.
]
Equivalently,
\frac{1}{8}
\sin2\theta_{12}
\sin2\theta_{23}
\sin2\theta_{13}
\cos\theta_{13}
\sin\delta_{\rm CP}.
]
[
P_{\alpha\beta}-P_{\bar{\alpha}\bar{\beta}}
\propto
J_{\rm CP}
\sin\Delta_{21}
\sin\Delta_{31}
\sin\Delta_{32}.
]
The electron-neutrino matter potential is
[
V_e=\sqrt{2}G_FN_e.
]
For antineutrinos:
[
V_{\bar e}=-\sqrt{2}G_FN_e.
]
Here,
[
N_e=Y_e\frac{\rho}{m_N},
]
where (\rho) is the matter density and (Y_e) is the electron fraction.
2\sqrt{2}G_FN_eE.
]
\frac{
\sin^2(2\theta)
}{
\left(
\cos2\theta-\frac{A}{\Delta m^2}
\right)^2
+
\sin^2(2\theta)
}.
]
\Delta m^2
\sqrt{
\left(
\cos2\theta-\frac{A}{\Delta m^2}
\right)^2
+
\sin^2(2\theta)
}.
]
\sin^2(2\theta_m)
\sin^2\left(
\frac{\Delta m_m^2L}{4E}
\right).
]
The Mikheyev–Smirnov–Wolfenstein resonance condition is
\Delta m^2\cos2\theta.
]
\frac{
\Delta m^2\cos2\theta
}{
2\sqrt{2}G_FE
}.
]
\frac{
\Delta m^2\cos2\theta
}{
2\sqrt{2}G_FN_e
}.
]
At resonance:
[
\theta_m=\frac{\pi}{4}
]
and therefore
[
\sin^2(2\theta_m)=1.
]
In the flavor basis:
H_f|\nu_f\rangle.
]
For three-flavor propagation in matter:
\frac{1}{2E}
U
\begin{pmatrix}
m_1^2&0&0\
0&m_2^2&0\
0&0&m_3^2
\end{pmatrix}
U^\dagger
+
\begin{pmatrix}
V_e&0&0\
0&0&0\
0&0&0
\end{pmatrix}.
]
[
L_{\rm coh}^{ij}
\simeq
\frac{4\sqrt{2}E^2\sigma_x}
{|\Delta m_{ij}^2|},
]
where (\sigma_x) is the spatial width of the neutrino wave packet.
[
\Delta x_{ij}
\simeq
\frac{|\Delta m_{ij}^2|L}{2E^2}.
]
Oscillations remain coherent when
[
\Delta x_{ij}\lesssim \sigma_x.
]
-\frac{g}{\sqrt{2}}
\bar{\ell}\alpha
\gamma^\mu P_L
U{\alpha i}\nu_i
W_\mu^{-}
+\mathrm{h.c.}
]
-\frac{g}{2\cos\theta_W}
\bar{\nu}i
\gamma^\mu P_L
\nu_i
Z\mu.
]
The left-handed projection operator is
[
P_L=\frac{1-\gamma^5}{2}.
]
\frac{g^2}{8M_W^2}.
]
The weak interaction strength at low energies is controlled by (G_F).
N_T
\int
\Phi_\nu(E)
,\sigma_\nu(E)
,\epsilon(E)
,P_{\alpha\beta}(E,L)
,dE,dt.
]
For a narrow energy interval:
[
N_{\rm events}
\simeq
\Phi_\nu
,\sigma_\nu
,N_T
,\epsilon
,T.
]
Here:
(\Phi_\nu): neutrino flux,
(\sigma_\nu): interaction cross section,
(N_T): number of targets,
(\epsilon): detection efficiency,
(T): exposure time.
\frac{M_{\rm det}}{M_{\rm mol}}
N_A n_{\rm target},
]
where (N_A) is Avogadro’s constant.
\frac{1}{n_T\sigma_\nu}.
]
Using matter density:
\frac{1}
{\rho N_A\sigma_\nu},
]
with an appropriate target-number conversion.
1-e^{-L/\lambda_\nu}.
]
For (L\ll\lambda_\nu):
[
P_{\rm int}\simeq \frac{L}{\lambda_\nu}.
]
e^{-L/\lambda_\nu}.
]
\int n_T(s)\sigma_\nu(E),ds.
]
The transmission probability is
e^{-\tau_\nu}.
]
Using column density (X):
N_A,\sigma_\nu(E),X.
]
For
[
\nu_\ell+e^-\rightarrow\nu_\ell+e^-,
]
the differential cross section can be written as
g_Lg_R\frac{m_eT}{E_\nu^2}
\right],
]
where (T) is the electron recoil kinetic energy.
\frac{2E_\nu^2}
{m_e+2E_\nu}.
]
For antineutrinos, the roles of (g_L) and (g_R) are interchanged.
The principal reactor-antineutrino reaction is
[
\bar{\nu}_e+p\rightarrow e^++n.
]
\frac{
(m_n+m_e)^2-m_p^2
}{
2m_p
}
\simeq 1.806\ \mathrm{MeV}.
]
[
E_{\bar{\nu}e}
\simeq
E{e^+}
+
(m_n-m_p).
]
If (E_{e^+}) is the total positron energy:
[
E_{\bar{\nu}e}
\simeq
E{e^+}+1.293\ \mathrm{MeV}.
]
Using positron kinetic energy (T_{e^+}):
[
E_{\bar{\nu}e}
\simeq
T{e^+}+1.806\ \mathrm{MeV}.
]
[
\sigma_{\rm IBD}
\simeq
\frac{
G_F^2\cos^2\theta_C
}{
\pi
}
(1+3g_A^2)
E_ep_e.
]
For neutrinos:
[
\nu_\ell+n\rightarrow\ell^-+p.
]
For antineutrinos:
[
\bar{\nu}_\ell+p\rightarrow\ell^++n.
]
An approximate reconstructed neutrino energy is
\left(
m_\ell^2+m_N^2-m_{N'}^2
\right)
}{
2\left(
m_N-E_\ell+p_\ell\cos\theta_\ell
\right)
}.
]
Nuclear binding-energy corrections are normally included in realistic analyses.
[
Q^2=-q^2
]
\frac{Q^2}{2p\cdot q}
]
\frac{p\cdot q}{p\cdot k}.
]
For a stationary nucleon:
\frac{E_\nu-E_\ell}{E_\nu}.
]
yE_\nu.
]
[
E_\nu
\simeq
E_\ell+E_{\rm had}.
]
At sufficiently high energies, the total neutrino–nucleon cross section is approximately proportional to energy:
[
\sigma_{\nu N}\propto E_\nu.
]
For CE(\nu)NS:
[
\nu+A\rightarrow\nu+A.
]
The differential cross section is approximately
\frac{G_F^2M}{4\pi}
Q_W^2
\left(
1-\frac{MT}{2E_\nu^2}
\right)
F^2(Q^2),
]
where
N-
(1-4\sin^2\theta_W)Z.
]
\frac{2E_\nu^2}
{M+2E_\nu}.
]
[
qR\lesssim1.
]
For nuclear beta decay:
[
(A,Z)\rightarrow(A,Z+1)+e^-+\bar{\nu}_e.
]
Near the endpoint, the electron spectrum contains
[
\frac{dN}{dE_e}
\propto
F(Z,E_e),
p_eE_e
(E_0-E_e)
\sqrt{
(E_0-E_e)^2-m_\beta^2
}.
]
\sum_i
|U_{ei}|^2m_i^2.
]
The process is
[
(A,Z)\rightarrow(A,Z+2)+2e^-.
]
Its inverse half-life is
G^{0\nu}
|M^{0\nu}|^2
\left|
\frac{m_{\beta\beta}}{m_e}
\right|^2.
]
\left|
\sum_i
U_{ei}^{,2}m_i
\right|.
]
For three neutrinos:
\left|
m_1c_{12}^2c_{13}^2
+
m_2s_{12}^2c_{13}^2e^{i\alpha_{21}}
+
m_3s_{13}^2e^{i(\alpha_{31}-2\delta_{\rm CP})}
\right|.
]
A Dirac mass term is
-m_D\bar{\nu}_L\nu_R+\mathrm{h.c.}
]
After electroweak symmetry breaking:
\frac{y_\nu v}{\sqrt{2}},
]
where (y_\nu) is the neutrino Yukawa coupling and (v) is the Higgs vacuum expectation value.
A Majorana mass term has the form
-\frac{1}{2}
m_M
\overline{\nu_L^c}\nu_L
+\mathrm{h.c.}
]
A Majorana particle satisfies
[
\nu=\nu^c.
]
The neutrino mass matrix can be written as
\begin{pmatrix}
0&m_D\
m_D^T&M_R
\end{pmatrix}.
]
When (M_R\gg m_D), the light-neutrino mass matrix is
[
m_\nu
\simeq
-m_DM_R^{-1}m_D^T.
]
For one generation:
[
m_{\rm light}
\simeq
\frac{m_D^2}{M_R}.
]
The heavy-neutrino mass is approximately
[
m_{\rm heavy}\simeq M_R.
]
The dimension-five neutrino-mass operator is
\frac{c_{\alpha\beta}}{\Lambda}
\left(
\overline{L_\alpha^c}\tilde{H}^{*}
\right)
\left(
\tilde{H}^{\dagger}L_\beta
\right)
+\mathrm{h.c.}
]
After electroweak symmetry breaking:
[
m_\nu
\sim
\frac{cv^2}{\Lambda}.
]
The magnetic-moment interaction is
\frac{1}{2}
\mu_\nu
\bar{\nu}
\sigma_{\mu\nu}
\nu
F^{\mu\nu}.
]
For a minimally extended Standard Model Dirac neutrino:
[
\mu_\nu
\simeq
\frac{3eG_Fm_\nu}
{8\sqrt{2}\pi^2}.
]
It is commonly expressed in units of the Bohr magneton:
[
\mu_B=\frac{e\hbar}{2m_e}.
]
\sin^2(\mu_\nu B_\perp L)
]
for a simple constant-field approximation.
For a rest-frame lifetime (\tau_i), the survival probability is
\exp\left(
-\frac{L}{\gamma_i c\tau_i}
\right).
]
Since
[
\gamma_i=\frac{E_i}{m_i},
]
we obtain
\exp\left(
-\frac{Lm_i}{E_i c\tau_i}
\right).
]
In natural units:
\exp\left(
-\frac{Lm_i}{E_i\tau_i}
\right).
]
For (m_\nu\ll E_\nu):
[
v_\nu
\simeq
c\left(
1-\frac{m_\nu^2c^4}{2E_\nu^2}
\right).
]
The delay relative to a massless particle is approximately
[
\Delta t
\simeq
\frac{L}{2c}
\frac{m_\nu^2c^4}{E_\nu^2}.
]
For two mass eigenstates:
[
\Delta t_{ij}
\simeq
\frac{L}{2c}
\frac{\Delta m_{ij}^2c^4}{E_\nu^2}.
]
For isotropic emission from a source with neutrino luminosity (L_\nu):
\frac{L_\nu}{4\pi d^2}.
]
If (L_\nu) is an energy luminosity, the approximate number flux is
\frac{L_\nu}
{4\pi d^2\langle E_\nu\rangle}.
]
\frac{dN_\nu}
{dE,dA,dt}.
]
\int \Phi_\nu(E,t),dt.
]
A common model is
\Phi_0
\left(
\frac{E}{E_0}
\right)^{-\gamma}.
]
The energy-weighted flux is
[
E^2\frac{d\Phi_\nu}{dE}.
]
For an (E^{-2}) spectrum:
\text{constant}.
]
A standard pion-decay source approximately produces
1:2:0.
]
After propagation over astrophysical distances, oscillations approximately give
[
\nu_e:\nu_\mu:\nu_\tau
\approx
1:1:1.
]
The averaged transition probability is
\sum_i
|U_{\alpha i}|^2
|U_{\beta i}|^2.
]
The observed flux is
\sum_\alpha
\overline{P}{\alpha\beta}
\Phi\alpha^{S}.
]
[
\pi^+
\rightarrow
\mu^+
+
\nu_\mu
]
[
\pi^-
\rightarrow
\mu^-
+
\bar{\nu}_\mu.
]
[
\mu^+
\rightarrow
e^+
+
\nu_e
+
\bar{\nu}_\mu
]
[
\mu^-
\rightarrow
e^-
+
\bar{\nu}e
+
\nu\mu.
]
For a two-body decay (A\rightarrow B+\nu), in the rest frame of (A):
\frac{m_A^2-m_B^2+m_\nu^2}
{2m_A}.
]
For negligible neutrino mass:
[
E_\nu
\simeq
\frac{m_A^2-m_B^2}{2m_A}.
]
[
n\rightarrow p+e^-+\bar{\nu}_e.
]
Energy conservation gives
E_p+E_e+E_{\bar{\nu}_e}.
]
The available decay energy is
(m_n-m_p-m_e)c^2.
]
The net proton–proton chain reaction is
[
4p
\rightarrow
{}^4\mathrm{He}
+
2e^+
+
2\nu_e
+
\text{energy}.
]
Approximately two electron neutrinos are produced per completed chain.
The solar-neutrino flux at Earth is approximately
\frac{\dot N_\nu}
{4\pi d_{\rm ES}^2}.
]
A reactor spectrum can be modeled as
\sum_i
f_iS_i(E),
]
where (f_i) is the fission rate of isotope (i) and (S_i(E)) is its antineutrino spectrum.
The detector flux is
\frac{1}{4\pi L^2}
\sum_i f_iS_i(E).
]
Including oscillations:
\Phi_{\bar{\nu}e}^{0}
P{\bar e\bar e}.
]
For approximately thermal emission:
4\pi R_\nu^2
\left(\frac{7}{8}\right)
\sigma_{\rm SB}T_\nu^4
]
for one fermionic species under an idealized blackbody approximation.
[
\frac{dN_\nu}{dE}
\propto
\frac{E^2}
{\exp(E/T_\nu-\eta_\nu)+1}.
]
\frac{1}{4\pi d^2}
\frac{d\dot N_\nu}{dE}.
]
For standard relic neutrinos:
\left(\frac{4}{11}\right)^{1/3}T_\gamma.
]
The neutrino number density per flavor, including neutrino and antineutrino, is approximately
\frac{3}{11}n_\gamma.
]
[
\Omega_\nu h^2
\simeq
\frac{\sum_i m_{\nu_i}}
{93.14\ \mathrm{eV}}.
]
\rho_\gamma
\left[
1+
\frac{7}{8}
\left(\frac{4}{11}\right)^{4/3}
N_{\rm eff}
\right].
]
\frac{
\rho_{\rm rad}/\rho_\gamma-1
}{
\frac{7}{8}
\left(\frac{4}{11}\right)^{4/3}
}.
]
This quantity parameterizes the relativistic energy density beyond photons.
An approximate thermal neutrino velocity is
[
v_\nu
\simeq
\frac{\langle p_\nu\rangle}{m_\nu}
]
for nonrelativistic neutrinos, where
[
\langle p_\nu\rangle
\simeq
3.15,T_\nu.
]
The free-streaming scale depends on the ratio
[
\lambda_{\rm FS}
\sim
\frac{v_\nu}{H}.
]
For a neutrino produced at altitude (h), detected at Earth radius (R_\oplus), and zenith angle (\theta_z):
R_\oplus\cos\theta_z.
]
For an upward-going neutrino produced close to the surface:
[
L\approx -2R_\oplus\cos\theta_z
]
for (\cos\theta_z<0).
For nadir angle (\theta_n):
2R_\oplus\cos\theta_n.
]
For an emergence angle (\alpha) above the local horizon:
[
L_{\rm chord}
\simeq
2R_\oplus\sin\alpha.
]
This is important for Earth-skimming tau-neutrino calculations.
A tau produced by a (\nu_\tau) interaction has decay length
\gamma_\tau c\tau_\tau.
]
Using
[
\gamma_\tau=\frac{E_\tau}{m_\tau c^2},
]
we obtain
\frac{E_\tau}{m_\tau c^2}
c\tau_\tau.
]
In natural units:
\frac{E_\tau}{m_\tau}\tau_\tau.
]
A schematic transport equation is
-N_A\sigma_{\rm tot}(E)\Phi_{\nu_\tau}(E,X)
+
S_{\rm NC}(E,X)
+
S_{\tau\rightarrow\nu_\tau}(E,X).
]
The first term describes attenuation, while the source terms describe neutral-current down-scattering and tau-decay regeneration.
For a high-energy muon or tau traveling through matter:
a(E)+b(E)E.
]
Here:
(a(E)): ionization loss,
(b(E)E): radiative loss.
For constant (a) and (b), the range is approximately
\frac{1}{b}
\ln
\left(
\frac{a+bE}
{a+bE_{\rm min}}
\right).
]
Cherenkov emission occurs when
[
\beta n>1,
]
where
[
\beta=\frac{v}{c}.
]
\frac{1}{\beta n}.
]
\frac{mc^2}
{\sqrt{1-\frac{1}{n^2}}}.
]
\frac{2\pi\alpha}{\lambda^2}
\left(
1-\frac{1}{\beta^2n^2}
\right).
]
The expected event rate can be written as
T
\int
\Phi_\nu(E,\Omega)
A_{\rm eff}(E,\Omega)
,dE,d\Omega.
]
The effective area may be expressed schematically as
A_{\rm geom}
P_{\rm int}
P_{\rm trigger}
P_{\rm selection}.
]
V_{\rm gen}
\frac{N_{\rm selected}}{N_{\rm generated}}.
]
The effective target mass is
\rho V_{\rm eff}.
]
A corresponding effective area may be estimated using
[
A_{\rm eff}
\sim
V_{\rm eff}\rho N_A\sigma_\nu.
]
A_{\rm eff}(E)T.
]
For a direction-dependent experiment:
\int
A_{\rm eff}(E,\Omega,t),dt.
]
Expected events:
\int
\Phi(E,\Omega),
\mathcal{E}(E,\Omega)
,dE,d\Omega.
]
For a simple counting experiment with signal (S) and background (B):
[
Z\simeq\frac{S}{\sqrt{B}}
]
when (B) is sufficiently large.
A more accurate Asimov significance is
\sqrt{
2\left[
(S+B)\ln\left(1+\frac{S}{B}\right)-S
\right]
}.
]
\frac{\mu^ne^{-\mu}}{n!}.
]
For binned Poisson data:
\prod_i
\frac{
\mu_i(\boldsymbol{\theta})^{n_i}
e^{-\mu_i(\boldsymbol{\theta})}
}{
n_i!
}.
]
The log-likelihood is
\sum_i
\left[
n_i\ln\mu_i-\mu_i-\ln(n_i!)
\right].
]
A likelihood-ratio statistic is
-2\ln
\left[
\frac{
\mathcal{L}(\boldsymbol{\theta})
}{
\mathcal{L}(\hat{\boldsymbol{\theta}})
}
\right].
]
A simple chi-square statistic is
\sum_i
\frac{
\left(
N_i^{\rm obs}-N_i^{\rm pred}
\right)^2
}{
\sigma_i^2
}.
]
With nuisance parameters (\eta_k):
\chi^2_{\rm data}
+
\sum_k
\left(
\frac{\eta_k}{\sigma_{\eta_k}}
\right)^2.
]
Three distinct mass observables are commonly used:
\sqrt{
\sum_i|U_{ei}|^2m_i^2
}.
]
\left|
\sum_iU_{ei}^{2}m_i
\right|.
]
m_1+m_2+m_3.
]
These observables probe different combinations of neutrino masses and mixing parameters.